Court:
|
City of London MC |
Hearing date:
|
15.10.19 |
Bench (DJ or JPs)
|
3 lay magistrates |
Defendant 1:
|
Defendant |
Charged with:
|
S14 |
Represented by:
|
Yes, pro bono acquaintance |
Please outline prosecution and defense case(s).
|
Her barrister made an early challenge that the police evidence statement mentioned that the S14 order was in place (Waterloo Bridge) on 14,15,16 April but not on 20, her date of arrest. Therefore no S14 in place.
Case dismissed, costs awarded (but only train fares claimed) |
Was defense evidence submitted in writing?
|
Yes but not referred to
|
Did defense witness(es) give evidence in person? Were they cross-examined?
|
N/A |
What was the verdict?
|
Case dismissed |
What was the sentence?
|
N/A |
What costs were awarded?
|
£30 to the defendant |
Please add anything else relevant.
|
Amazing!! |